A few years ago, I found myself chatting with a soon to retire administrator at my daughter's school. I was expressing my frustration over scheduling conflicts for an important parent meeting we were hosting. As we walked to find an unoccupied classroom, the administrator attempted to console me by saying "you have to remember, it's just a public school".
One of Google's definitions for "just" is: "merely: and nothing more; "I was merely asking"; "it is simply a matter of time"; "just a scratch"; "he was only a child"; "hopes that last but a ...".
Using the first of the examples, that administrator was attempting to make me feel better by telling me that this was merely a public school and nothing more. Thus, in essence, stating that my expectations needed to be lowered because I had forgotten that public schools have to be accepted for what they are, and nothing more.
Asking me to accept a bad situation because it cant' be changed begs the question of accepting givens. If I accept what someone else tells me is a given, I choose not to vest myself in fixing the problem. If I accept someone else's report that "everything is fine", I am simply saying "I trust your judgment and/or I don't have the time or ability to check things out myself".
Let me pause for a moment and state unequivocally that this is not a treatise on the merits of micro management or promoting a strong lack of trust in others abilities or their intentions. I don't have time to do all of the tasks assigned to others, nor do I believe that this is ever healthy for organizations. That being said, I am much more interested in the concept of acceptance of bad situations, or as I like to put it, "the immutable nature of mediocrity".
Accepting Public Schools as being "just public schools", pays homage to their inability to change. If I don't challenge the position of a retiring administrator who has come to accept the immutable nature of Public Schools, I deserve all that comes with the sorry state of public education. And accept that my children will be provided with a mediocre education.
The next time someone uses the word JUST as a modifier, or asks you to accept the situation as a given and just, well.... immutable, you have a choice: Accept, or challenge and change.
1 comment:
I am fortunate. I get to teach enthusiastic students who want to teach in the LAUSD. Some are already parents, some are barely out of high school, and some are in between. But one of the things they have in common is their unwillingness to accept mediocrity in the schools.
When we read and discuss John Taylor Gatto, Jean Anyon and Rafe Esquith, our class discussions are filled with their own stories of the bad teachers, but also very much of the good teachers, those who inspired them, the models of what they want to bring into the classroom.
The attitudes you have heard and written about are rampant, which perhaps is one reason education seems to get so little attention, so little positive attention. Teachers, especially in the K-middle schools, are doing the most important job there can possibly be. As we discuss in class, it is an awesome responsibility, and when people say it is "just" a public school, they are saying quite a bit about who we are as a community and a nation. That same attitude has been reflected by our elected leaders, despite the words they say. It is clear by their actions, in every budget.
You're right. It is up to each and every one of us to stand up and support our schools in every way possible. That doesn't mean to accept mediocrity in any way. It means that our children are important, and we have to find ways to nourish them, to understand them, to teach them, to push them, to love them, and to support them.
If I didn't have the opportunity to work with the students I do, I don't think I would be as optimistic as I am, because I wouldn't experience their commitment to those children, and future generations. Thank you for starting this dialogue.
Post a Comment